WHO FCTC’s anti-tobacco efforts are again under fire as it celebrates its 20th anniversary this year. Photo credit: Pixabay.
As the World Health Organization (WHO) marks the 20th anniversary of its Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the occasion has become a focal point for criticism from health experts, consumer advocates, and harm reduction proponents. A panel hosted by the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA) highlighted what they called decades of stagnation, missed opportunities, and resistance to innovation in tobacco harm reduction.
"The FCTC should have marked a turning point in global tobacco control," said Clive Bates, former director of Action on Smoking and Health (UK). "Instead, the WHO remains entrenched in outdated, prohibition-style thinking. They actively oppose safer alternatives like vaping, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches—tools that are demonstrably helping people quit smoking."
Critics argue that WHO's refusal to embrace harm reduction strategies is both scientifically unsound and counterproductive, urging countries to reconsider their adherence to WHO policy and instead pursue more pragmatic, evidence-based approaches to improving public health.
Roger Bate, a global health policy expert at the International Center for Law and Economics, sharply criticized WHO’s credibility. "Whether it's Covid-19 or tobacco policy, the WHO has failed repeatedly," he said. "We need fundamental reform. If the organization cannot evolve to incorporate modern science and real-world solutions, then it risks becoming obsolete."
David Williams, TPA president, echoed these concerns, describing WHO’s approach as "dangerous and irresponsible." He pointed to the organization’s refusal to acknowledge the benefits of smoke-free alternatives despite growing evidence of their effectiveness. "E-cigarettes and nicotine pouches are saving lives," Williams said. "These are tools funded by taxpayers, yet the WHO continues to reject them without sound justification. That's not just bad policy—it's negligence."
Martin Cullip, international fellow at TPA's Consumer Center, summed up the panel's frustration. "The FCTC was a good idea that has gone terribly wrong. We've lost 20 years of potential progress because of rigid ideology."
The panel urged WHO leaders to abandon a dogmatic stance and embrace harm reduction as a key component of tobacco control moving forward. As Clive Bates concluded, "The WHO has become unethical, unaccountable, and ineffective. If they truly care about saving lives, they must stop ignoring the science. Harm reduction has to be part of the solution."